Help, it's over.
At least for now, anyway. There's going to be a third season, thank god. I experienced about thirty seconds of horrified despair between the moment my stream ended on Alec's stoic, lonely face, and when I hopped on Twitter to see that - no - oh please, please - yes - YES there was going to be another season! Whew.
It's not often I allow myself to helplessly fangirl over things, but after seven weeks of suspense, I figure I've probably earned it. So don't mind me if I get a bit sentimental here. All the nail-biting is finally over, and the characters are getting on with their lives. It's great to finish a season of such great TV, but it also leaves one feeling a wee bit bereft for a while.
Overall, this was a truly masterful episode. The mystery finally unraveled; the cast put in outstanding performances; it was tightly plotted, fast-paced, with a real emotional kick in the tail: a fitting end to an excellent season.
We came first to Joe's trial - that arduous, season-long saga that looked like it might never end. After the horrible cliffhanger last episode, hearing the 'not guilty' verdict shouldn't have been surprising, but it was still a blow. There was no screams or loud drama when the verdict was given - just an anguished silence from the Latimers and Ellie, which was far more effective than anything else would have been. I felt especially sorry for Chloe, holding the baby, weeping off by herself. Tom comforting Ellie was a touching role reversal and a great little character moment. As shocking as the verdict was, and as brutal for everyone there, from a writing perspective, it was the only thing to do - otherwise what would have been the point of dragging it out all season only for Joe to be convicted? The shot of Joe driving out the court gates past the devastated Latimers was sickening. Honestly, at this point I was hoping someone would do the world a favour and pop him off.
![]() |
"Hey Beth, fancy a bit of DIY justice?" |
I felt sorry for Ellie, still reeling from the verdict, being confronted by a very angry Scotsman with a motivational speech. Alec's a blunt instrument as always, and he pushes her to her limits, but there was a grain of truth in his diatribe, and she certainly rose to the challenge (doesn't she always?). However, I think the slight awkwardness from this scene was a good example of the rushed plotting in this episode. So much happened with Sandbrook this week, and relatively little in episode 7. If the pace of events had been more evenly spread over the two episodes, I think it would have felt more convincing.
![]() |
"Welcome to Hardy's Anger Management 101. Let's go roast some suspects." |
Sandbrook...this is what had been keeping so many of us up nights, freeze-framing and examining episodes for clues, and generally driving ourselves a wee bit nuts. After all that speculation, the solution was something I didn't see coming. Am I disappointed I didn't guess it? No. Did it live up to the build-up? Mostly, yes. The flashbacks, finally showing us what happened on that awful night, were well shot and concisely paced; and Alec and Ellie's horrified, revolted expressions mirrored mine as I sat in slight shock. It was more or less what we all expected, I think, but the reality of the details was terrible. The horror of seeing those lovely girls murdered was really too much and I almost couldn't bear to look - which, of course, is the only decent reaction to violence like that, and I appreciate that Broadchurch never succumbs to violence as sensationalism - it never cheapens the very real horror of a crime like that. The cleverness of the solution was the absence of a single cold-blooded perpetrator - as many of us had suspected, there
were so many layers

David Tennant had lots to work with this episode, and he's pitch-perfect as a man who's on the verge of emotional disintegration and taking it all very personally - the rage, the suddenly red-rimmed eyes and the quaver in the voice. Once again, as in Season 1, Alec gets to deliver the coda of the story, and this time it's particularly dark - that love always turns sour and that no one can be trusted, ever, not even the people you care for most. It obviously struck deep for Ellie, and I was sorry she had to hear that. It was hammering home the conclusion of Alec's character this season - that even when he's won, he's still convinced he's utterly alone.
![]() |
He did it. |
How much of my Sandbrook theories were correct? Funnily enough, I don't really care - the entertaining part was the speculation, and since I was happy with how the mystery was resolved, I don't mind that most of my theories were three buses and a long hike away from what actually happened. Most shockingly for me, Cate played no part at all in the murders. I was pretty convinced she was a murderer hiding-in-plain-sight, like Joe was last season, but no. I was a bit closer to the mark with the theories that a) the murders would be crimes of passion, b) there would be multiple perpetrators, and c) Pippa would be a victim of the anger and sexual infidelity of the adults. It was nice not to be completely wide of the mark, but really, the fun part is not knowing.
![]() |
"Since when does Alec sign his texts "xox"? Must be his new heart playing up." |
One thing I really enjoyed about Season 1 is that Broadchurch cares about all the characters, including the minor ones, and we got fitting resolutions for all of them. This season's finale wasn't quite as successful here, but managed to leave most of the characters at a more or less convincing place.
Rev Paul, that complex mixture of neediness and philanthropy, got to do something constructive for a change and atone for his self-righteous meddling all season.
Jocelyn and Sharon's sort-of-reconciliation, coming straight after Alec and Ellie's highly emotional scenes, felt rather unimportant and a little too tidy. Not everything needs to be wrapped up with a bow. Hopefully their new case won't be a plotline in Season 3, because I'm really not interested.

Conspicuously absent from this scene was Alec, who for the first time ever straightens his tie as he's about to leave Broadchurch - a hopeful sign that he's beginning to repair himself as well. But it's very clear that he doesn't want to leave - the town he hated has become his closest thing to a home - and that's mostly because of Ellie. Some people are convinced he doesn't actually leave after the credits roll - but of course he does. I'm betting he'll spend about six months getting to know his daughter and quietly missing his buddy Millah, and then he'll find some pretext or other to rope her back in to a case. And the world will be back on its axis again, and I'll be happy.
Broadchurch has stumbled a few times this season, but it sure knows how to end well. The last fifteen minutes were exquisitely paced, acted, and scored, and the absolute masterpiece was Ellie and Alec's amusingly awkward, keenly poignant goodbye in his little blue cottage. Just put Olivia Colman and David Tennant in a room and let them do what they do best - and the result is always spectacular. I cried, I really did, which might be silly, but the obvious subtext of the scene is that neither of them want him to leave, but neither can find a suitable reason for him to stay. I couldn't believe she refused a hug. Come on, the poor man started out as a human porcupine and he's been trying to hug her for a whole season now. But she was too fragile - and fair enough. Still, it underscored the more subtle fact that he seems to care more about her than vice versa, but their friendship isn't easy to categorise. It's certainly not anything like love, yet it's not quite your average friendship either. It's been beautiful watching them fall from distrust into trust, but it was inevitable that they'd part ways sooner or later. As I said a few weeks ago, I'm struggling to think of a resolution to their relationship that would be neither cloying nor sad, and yet convincing. I just want them to be grumpy crime-solving best friends forever...
Because the fact is that they need each other. Mostly, Alec actually needs Ellie. This might seem obvious, but the finale underlined how terribly grim Alec's view of the world is. He truly believes that everything is futile, that everyone betrays their loved ones in the end. And Ellie is the only person who can not only understand him, but tell him to snap out of it and actually show him - just by being his friend - that he's wrong. And Alec is the only person who will stubbornly be there for Ellie even when she rebuffs him - even if he's totally emotionally incompetent, he just never gives up - and she needs someone who offers her awkward hugs and asks her whether she's eaten today. So in some ways the question of whether their relationship should be platonic or romantic isn't the point - the point is that they actually do need each other, and that's why there was such a sense of loss when they went their separate ways.
Sigh.
Now for the criticism.
What were the episode's weakest points? For me, the biggest one was Claire. Eve Myles is a wonderful actress, but Claire's writing felt rather forced here. First she was the increasingly dodgy liar - then she was the sympathetic victim of circumstances - and finally she's an utter psycho who helped murder a child in cold blood and would do anything, including accusing Alec of raping her, to defend her equally murderous (and cheating) husband. Something in there doesn't compute. Which is she? Although I was always engaged with the big focus this season had on the mystery of Claire, I felt like it didn't pay off quite as well as it could have. And speaking of her accusation against Alec - that really bothered me, actually, as a writing choice. I know the point of it was to emphasise that Claire is utterly deranged and will defend Lee no matter what, but actually in real life, when women say they've been raped it's almost always true (just like for any other crime). It just didn't sit right with me because it wasn't essential to the plot, and it reinforces that horrible myth that "women just make it up sometimes". Screenwriters need to take that seriously.
![]() |
She's very, very creepy. |
-Who sent Claire the bluebell? I don't think it was ever stated - do we presume Ricky?
-The bluebell thing - such a huge and frustrating clue - didn't feel so very important in the end.
-Some of the procedural stuff around Sandbrook seemed to be conveniently ignored - like the fact that all the evidence Alec and Ellie had collected and everything they'd done while the case was closed would not only be inadmissible in court, it would be illegal.
-The script was weighed down with a few overly heavy-handed lines - especially in the posturing between Jocelyn and Sharon in the cloakroom.
With the benefit of hindsight, it's clear that there were also problems with Season 2 as a whole, and they deserve to be mentioned.
-Episodes 2 and 3 descended into melodrama and chaos at times, jarring the series' usually expert hold on restraint and
deliberate progress.
-Some threads did lead nowhere in particular - or didn't turn out to be as important as we thought - a problem with any extended whodunnit, and what made Season 1 an absolute miracle was that that problem was almost nonexistent.
-Most importantly, too much screen time was spent on Joe's trial. The trial could only have two outcomes and all the angst was directed at a fairly predictable endpoint. By contrast, Sandbrook had far more potential as a story and could have gone in a million different directions, but it ended up sacrificing screen time to the procedural drama and its subplots, like the strain on the Latimers (this felt at times like re-treading Season 1 ground) and the rivalry between Sharon and Jocelyn (this wasn't given enough development and fell very flat), which never really measured up to their potential.
However, despite these caveats, I still enjoyed this season immensely because...well, I could go on about all the things that are great - the solid writing, the sublime talent, the unlikely yet engaging relationship between the two main characters, the achingly beautiful musical score, the glorious cinematography - but I hope I've mentioned most of those in previous reviews. Ultimately, the faults don't stop me from enjoying Broadchurch because above all it succeeds in creating authentic people who are dealing with real problems.
Everyone has their own standards for what constitutes great drama, but that's how I judge it - on whether the people feel real. Pretty much the worst thing I can say about TV is "I just don't care what happens to these people". Because we forget plot details and cliffhangers, but we remember characters. We remember people. Broadchurch has been well-written and executed, thrilling and satisfying, and the characters will stay with me for a long time. That's pretty much all I ask of fiction.
![]() |
Would you like to be interviewed by them? Me neither. |
Whew! That's probably enough to get me started...! If you like the sound of any of this, you're very welcome to follow me and keep tabs on what I get up to. You can follow me on Twitter, follow the blog's Facebook page, or subscribe to my RSS feed. If Tumblr's your poison, I post a lot of Old Hollywood photographs and some Doctor Who art on my blog there, and I'm always up for a chat.
Until then!
For all Broadchurch posts, click here.
---
images source